ShareCare Available
Crawls the whole Microsoft 365 sharing and permission surface app-only, scores exposure by sensitivity and blast radius, and remediates — with a grace window and undo. The Copilot-readiness answer, across every tenant.
ShareCareSeQontrol watches everything your Microsoft 365 estate exposes — sharing and permissions, security posture, email authentication and the public web surface — with every finding tagged to the control it proves. The decisions you make upstream protect everything downstream.
Who’s looking after this estate?
Copilot surfaces anything a user can technically reach. Permissions that sat harmless for years became a live data-leak path overnight — and the rollout stalls until somebody can show the blast radius.
Auditors increasingly expect evidence that controls operate continuously, not a screenshot taken once a year. Every finding here is already tagged to the control it proves.

You run an MSP, an MSSP or a vCISO practice. Clients are asking whether Copilot is safe, and you need an answer that scales past doing it by hand, sixty times.
One console, one findings store and one audit trail underneath; a separate, scoped consent for each product on top. Four are running today. Two more are built but not released, and two are still in development.
Crawls the whole Microsoft 365 sharing and permission surface app-only, scores exposure by sensitivity and blast radius, and remediates — with a grace window and undo. The Copilot-readiness answer, across every tenant.
ShareCareConditional Access coverage, MFA gaps, over-privileged apps and risky sign-in patterns, with a tier you can only climb with evidence.
SecurityPortalFinds the public face of your organisation — including the hosts nobody wrote down — and grades it. No tenant, no consent, and the scan is free.
WebScanTakes every domain from DMARC monitoring to safe enforcement, writing the DNS records in-product for supported providers.
MailTrustConditional Access policy inventory, baseline coverage gaps and approval-gated policy write-back for the Entra estate.
ConditionalAccessPortalTurns the scans you already run into framework-mapped, audit-ready evidence. It proves the technical controls on the platforms SeQontrol supports — it is not a whole-company compliance programme.
CompliancePortalHolds your approved configuration as a versioned baseline and forces the decision on every deviation: revert it or ratify it.
DreddThe read-only board that aggregates findings, risk and coverage from every product, per tenant and fleet-wide.
PosturePortalMost products are sold on the same three steps. You buy the depth you actually want, and the step that writes to your tenant is always a deliberate, separate decision.
Inventory, scoring and findings history. Nothing in your tenant changes.
Policies, access reviews, approvals, waivers that expire, and evidence packs.
Write-back with undo, behind its own consent — and every change approved on its own.
Scanning is never metered. No per-scan pricing, no charging per finding, no hard cap that stops a scan for a commercial reason. You are billed on the size of the estate — a number you already know before you buy.
Not because compliance does not matter — it is a whole product here — but because a compliance control can be waived, and an attacker does not abide by your waivers.
Every framework has an exception process. A control gets accepted as a risk, signed off, and the report goes green. Nothing about the estate changed. Do that a few times across a few frameworks and you have built something worse than a gap: a documented, audited, board-reported sense of safety that does not correspond to anything real.
So the order is deliberate. The security finding is the fact. Compliance is an interpretation laid over that fact, and a waiver changes the interpretation only. You can accept a risk. You cannot make it disappear from the screen.
That is what the three words under the logo are ordered by: secure first, because it is the thing that is actually true; compliant second, because it is provable once the first is real; confident last, because confidence earned in that order is the only kind worth having.

Each is a real assessment with a real report at the end, whether or not you buy anything afterwards. Two of them need nothing from you but a domain name.
A scoped crawl of your tenant, or your worst few client tenants: anonymous links, external guests, company-wide shares and the app consents nobody remembers granting — scored, with the list of what to revoke. You can revoke the consent the moment the report lands.
Get my exposure reportSPF, DKIM, DMARC, BIMI and MTA-STS across your sending and parked domains, and what an attacker could send from the ones you forgot you owned.
Check my domainTLS, certificates, security headers, cookies, DNS hygiene and exposed content on the public face of your estate — graded against the standards that define each one.
Scan my siteThe three reasons people do not buy this. All three are reasonable, two of them are sometimes right, and we would rather say which.
For one tenant, one administrator and no reporting obligation — largely true. Secure Score, Purview and SharePoint Advanced Management ship with your licence and you should start there. A tool you already own and will actually check beats one you buy and ignore.
It stops being true when you need evidence that a control held over a period, or when you manage sixty tenants and nothing native spans them. The four specific gaps.
Good, and keep running it. CIPP administers tenants and it is free; nothing here replaces that, and running both is a normal setup rather than an awkward one.
What it was not built to do is retain a control-tagged record that something held over time. That does not matter until an insurer, an auditor or a client’s customer asks — and then it is the only thing that does. The honest split.
Correct instinct, and you do not have to. Scanning is read-only. The permission that writes is a separate consent you may never grant, and every read-only product keeps working without it.
If you do grant it, each change is approved on its own, and a refusal from your directory is recorded as a refusal rather than retried quietly. What we do with the access.
The spoofing check and the surface scan need only a domain — no tenant and no consent. The Copilot reach report needs a read-only connection and nothing more.
Sign up as a provider — the provider agreement is accepted online — and run it on your own tenant first, then on your worst few clients. Or have us scope that first assessment with you.
Built by JeffOps · Nieuwegein, the Netherlands · Data in Azure (Europe)